Kosher sex with your son's child bride

picture source

Ebenezer Henderson (1784 - 1858) was a minister in the Anglican church, and a highly accomplished linguist who understood perhaps twenty, or more languages. He spent two decades travelling and preaching in Eurasia, including several years—at the personal invitation of Czar Alexander I—spent exploring the vast Russian Empire, whilst supervising translations of the bible into numerous languages.   

A year after his return to Britain in 1825, he published his book Biblical Researches and Travels in Russia, in which he described his time in Poland, and the Jews he meet there. Henderson states that due to the Jewish custom of marrying their children off at a very young age, Jewish men in Poland would regularly have sexual relationships with their pubescent, and pre-pubescent daughters-in-laws, whilst their sons—the husbands of the abused girls—were still children themselves.

Henderson termed this "incestuous familiarity", he knew that sexual relationships with daughters-in-law are strictly forbidden in all branches of Judaism by G-d's Torah (Leviticus 18:15). But Henderson didn't seem to be aware that Rabbinical Jews (90% of the Jews in the world today), made themselves a Talmudic loophole, which exempts a Jewish man from being technically guilty of 1. Adultery, 2. Incest, if they have intercourse with their daughter-in-law, whilst her husband (their son) is still a minor.

Henderson wrote of the Jews in Poland (full book here):

"They generally marry at thirteen and fourteen years of age, and the females still younger. I have heard of a rabbi, who was disposing of his household, preparatory to his departure for Palestine, that gave one of his daughters in marriage who had but just completed her ninth year. As a necessary consequence of this early marriage, it often happens that the young couple are unable to provide for themselves ; and, indeed, altogether incapable, from youth and inexperience, of managing the common concerns of domestic economy. They are, therefore, often obliged to take up their abode at first in the house of the husband's father, except he be in reduced circumstances, and the father of the bride be better able to support them. The young husband pursues the study of the Talmud, or endeavours to make his way in the world by the varied arts of petty traffic for which this people are so notorious. It is asserted to be no uncommon thing among the Jews, for a father to choose for his son's wife some young girl who may happen to be agreeable to himself, and with whom he may live on terms of incestuous familiarity during the period of his son's minority."

"Our Rabbis taught: [And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour's (neighbour = Jew) wife the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death]. 'The man' excludes a minor; 'that committeth adultery with another man's wife' excludes the wife of a minor;"

— Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 52b, Soncino Edition

"LITERAL TRANSLATION

GEMARA Our Rabbis taught. "'And the man' — to exclude a minor. 'Who commits adultery with another man's wife' — to exclude the wife of a minor. 'His neighbour's wife' — to exclude the wife of a non-Jew (lit. 'others'). 'They shall Surely be put to death — by strangulation.

TRANSLATION AND COMMENTARY

... The words, 'who commits adultery with another man's wife,' teach that a man is only liable for adultery if he had sexual intercourse with the wife of a grown man, to the exclusion of the wife of a minor, for marriage of a minor has no validity in Torah law. The words 'his neighbour's wife,' teach that a man is only liable for adultery if he had sexual intercourse with the wife of a fellow Jew, to the exclusion of the wife of a non-Jew who is not considered a 'neighbour,' for the marriage of a Jewess to a non-Jew has no Halachic validity.

HALAKHAH (Jewish Law)

... "If a man had intercourse with the wife of a minor, he is not liable, for the marriage of a minor has no validity." "

— Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 52b, Steinsaltz Edition

Poland in 1823, the Jews and their slaves

American scholar Joseph Emerson Worcester originally published his two volume Geographical Dictionary in 1817, the extract below is from the expanded second edition, published in 1823:

"POLAND ... The constitution has been defined the government of a half a million of men of property, styled nobles, over 1,000,000 Jewish traders, and 13,000,000 slaves. ... The Jews comprise the men of business of the country ; the current money is chiefly in their hands, and a great proportion of the land is mortgaged to them."

Worcester, J. E. Geographical Dictionary or Universal Gazetteer, Ancient and Modern. 

Volume II (Second Edition). Boston: Cummings & Hilliard. 1823. pp.346-346.

Antisemitism in the City of Roses

This poster was was plastered on Jewish shops in Portland, Oregon during 1938. 

I've stolen the image from here

Who exactly called Marxism: "Judaism" ?

"Some call it Marxism—I call it Judaism"

- Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, or Rabbi Isaac M. Wise

I recently posted an article on the quote "Some call it Marxism (sometimes: communism)—I call it Judaism" attributed to American Zionist leader Stephen Samuel Wise, and concluded that it's almost certain that Wise never said it, and showed that the cited source for the quote; the American Bulletin, May 5th or 15th, 1935, was a very shoddy-looking American Nazi publication, it even had Hitler's swastika on its masthead.

But now I've discovered an article from 1955 which claims that it was American Reform Rabbi Isaac Mayer Wise (1819 - 1900) who said: "Some call it Marxism. I call it Judaism."

The article reproduced below, is from a magazine called Destiny, published by Anglo-Saxon Federation of America, who were British-Israelism promoters. Britons and descendants of Britons in the U.S. and elsewhere, who believe they are one of the Lost Tribes of Israel.

According Michael Barkun, multi award-winning debunker of "conspiracy theories" that involve Jews; the Anglo-Saxon Federation of America was "anti-semitic", and from it, derives the Christian Identity Movement. Barkun also claims Pat Robertson uses "anti-Semitic over-tones." This is the very same Pat Robertson, who in 2002 received the State of Israel Friendship Award from the Chicago chapter of the Zionist Organisation of American.

hyperlink to google book version

David Cesarani's big lie about the Irving trial

Above is "Holocaust on Trial", a television documentary on the Irving vs. Penguin & Lipstadt trial, made in late 2000 by British television production company 3BM (now part of Blakeway), for Boston's WGBH and Britain's Channel 4.

British-Jewish historian David Cesarani features heavily in the show, and is listed as the "Programme Consultant" in the final credits, so the outrageous lie featured in this documentary is his alone, and not the narrator's who says it—he's just reading his script.

At 42:50 a "Courtroom reenactment" begins, re-enacting an exchange between David Irving and defence witness; Jewish Auschwitz expert Robert Jan van Pelt, in which Irving (portrayed as an evil villain) quizzes Van Pelt (portrayed as science incarnate) over the amount of coke needed to cremate 120,000 bodies per month, the figure Van Pelt claims that the Nazis stated their four crematoriums at Auschwitz II (Birkenau) could process. The real exchange took place on the afternoon of the trial's ninth day (Tuesday, January 25, 2000), and the TV's show re-enactment is a long way from being how the exchange is recorded on the trial transcript—it's more of a dramatisation than a re-enactment.

At 45:50 the narrator states:

"In re-examination for the defence, Richard Rampton produces the patent application for the Topf ovens supplied to Auschwitz for incineration purposes."

After which the actors playing Rampton and Van Pelt, appear to divulge the horrific details of the cremation capacity at Auschwitz. After which somber musics begins, whilst it cuts to footage of Leichenkeller I of Krema 2, at Auschwitz II, the "gas chamber" in which "500,000" were killed. But this is all a complete hoax by the documentary's "Programme Consultant" i.e. David Cesarani.

Richard Rampton (the defence  barrister), began his re-examination of Robert Jan van Pelt on the afternoon of the trial's eleventh day (Thursday, January 27, 2000), two days after Irving had the exchange with Van Pelt which was re-enacted in the documentary. And Rampton did produce a patent application from Topf during his re-examination, but what the actor playing Van Pelt is reading out, is not—as the corrupt documentary insinuates—a war-time Topf patent application, but a report compiled 40 years after the war, about the said Topf patent application.

The impression the documentary intentionally gives, is that Van Pelt proved at the trial, with a genuine war time document on Auschwitz's cremation capacity, that the Nazis possessed the ability to cremate a human body with just 3.5kg of coke. When in reality, he just read from a mid-1980's report on a proposed oven, which never got off the drawing board. As you can see, the quote the actor playing Van Pelt reads, appears in the real Van Pelt's expert report for the trial:

"Pre-heating of such an oven should take at least two days. After this preheating the oven will not need any more fuel due to the heat produced by the corpses. It will be able to maintain its necessary high temperature through self-heating. But to allow it to maintain a constant temperature, it would have become necessary to introduce at the same time so-called well-fed and so-called emaciated corpses, because one can only guarantee continuous high temperatures through the emission of human fat.61"

61 Report Klaus and Christel Kunz, 25 April 1985, on patent application T 58240 Kl. 24 for a “Kontinuierliche arbeitender Leichen-Verbrennungsofen für Massenbetrieb,” Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum in Oswiecim, ms. BW 30/44.

- The Pelt Report (1999). By Professor Robert Jan van Pelt. p.305 & 317.

"we use subterfuges to circumvent him." - Talmud, Baba Kamma 113a

Richard Rampton even attempted to pull the same trick during the trial itself. Rampton asked Van Pelt to read from the 1985 report (which was quoted in Van Pelt's report), after giving the impression to the court that it was the November 5, 1942 Topf patent application he was referring to. But to Justice Gray's credit, he stated: "What you quote in your report does not read like a patent application. Is it a quote from the patent application?" After Gray discovered the ruse, Van Pelt apologised, but to Gray's detriment, he stated: "It probably does not affect the point."

For me to detail in full Rampton's attempted subterfuge, would decuple the length of this article. But it can be read on the trial transcript (Day 11, p.159-164); details of the patent application and the 1985 report about the patent application, can be read in Van Pelt's expert report for the trial (beginning in the paragraph in which footnote 806 is cited).

Not to be missed for any serious Revisionist, is Carlo Mattagno's thorough debunking of the 1985 report on the patent application, and the completely absurd inferences Van Pelt took from it (Case for Sanity, from p.446). 

Holocaust fear in Israel

"I support compulsory transfer. I do not see in it anything immoral [...] The Arabs will

have to go, but one needs an opportune moment for making it happen, such as a war."

— David Ben Gurion, letter to his son, 1937

As Zionists and their lackeys rev-up for a completely unjustifiable attack on one of the most peaceful nations in history. An attack which will inevitably trigger a wider conflict due to the world's reliance on oil shipped through Iranian waters. An attack which will also enable Israel to begin its Final Solution for the West Bank (Jewish lebensraum), the total ethnic cleansing of all Palestinians, under the excuse of "terrorist threat." Jews, despite being the aggressor, are once again portraying themselves as the victim, and, of course, playing the well worn Holocaust card.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/9606653/Holocaust-fears-haunt-Israelis-as-they-prepare-for-possible-war-with-Iran.html

False Rabbi Wise quote corrected

Much like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Rabbi Wise never said either of these things.

Almost two years ago I published an article entitled Some call it Marxism I call it Judaism, which I've now renamed Judaism is communism, a phrase used by Marxist-Kabbalist New Yorker, Dr. Harry Waton.

The reason for doing this, is that it was brought to my attention a while back—although it slipped my mind until this week—that the quote "Some call it Marxism I call it Judaism" is almost certainly fake. I was correctly informed, that the leader of the American Nazi Party, George Lincoln Rockwell, had quoted it (or a variation of it) in an interview with Playboy magazine (published in their April 1966 edition), but had been unable to authenticate it afterwards, despite be given the opportunity by the journalist. The following is from the interview:

PLAYBOY: The views of The Morning Freiheit certainly can't be said to reflect those of most American Jews, Commander. Can you give a specific example of a pro-Marxist statement by any recognized spokesman for American Jewry?

ROCKWELL: Just one? That's easy. Let's take a statement made by Rabbi Stephen Wise; he's one of the leading spokesmen for American Jewry.

PLAYBOY: He died in 1949.

ROCKWELL: Well, before he died, he wrote, "Some call it communism; I call it Judaism." That's a direct quote. I'd say that's putting it pretty unequivocally, wouldn't you?

PLAYBOY: Can you produce proof of that statement?

ROCKWELL: Certainly. I'll send it to you.

[The proof has not arrived, nor was Commander Rockwell able to tell us the name of the publication in which the alleged statement appeared. An official at Manhattan's Hebrew Union College, where Rabbi Wise's entire works are kept in archive, later said that no such statement appears anywhere in the late rabbi's writings. Rabbi Edward Kline, Wise's successor at New York's Free Synagogue, told us further that no such quote appears in any of Wise's speeches; nor could he, as a lifelong foe of communism, said Kline, have been capable of making such a remark. Confronted with this evidence, Rockwell later retracted the allegation. -Ed]

Rabbi Edward Kline (Playboy's source), who was himself calling for world government in 1950, was hand picked by Rabbi Stephen Wise as his successor. But Kline's assertion that Wise was a "lifelong foe of communism", is a complete and utter lie. Wise addressed the 2,000+ delegates and guests at Fifth Annual Conference of the Jewish Council for Russian War Relief in May 1946. Present was the Council's president, Lewis Levin, a devoted communist, and a member of Rabbi Wise's World Jewish Congress. Also present was Russian-Jew and Soviet propagandist, Elia Ehrenburg. During his speech, Wise stated: 

"As a Jew I want Jews to do all they can, and more than they can, for the Soviet Union and its peoples,"

But back to the Some call it Marxism/Communism, I call it Judaism quote. Unlike George Lincoln Rockwell, I have an internet search engine to help me discover the history of this quote.

A few of the early-ish uses of this quote I have found, do not cite a source for it, for example; former-governor of Oklahoma, William H. Murrary in his 1951 book Adam & Cain.

The earliest publication which I can find, which does cite a source for the quote, is the 1950s (possibly 1951) eight page pamphlet, published in London, entitled Cardinal Minszenty (see also & the actual Cardinal Minszenty), by a Lieutenant Hillary Cotter R.N. This is almost certainly Lieutenant Hilary James Coughtrie Cotter (1918 - 1997), who, according to this genealogical peerage site, served with Royal Navy during World War II, was stationed in British Somaliland during 1949-1950, and also spent time at Cold Water Air Force Base in Alberta, Canada.

Cotter's source for the quote is "The American Bulletin, 15th May, 1935". Later sources which feature the quote, also often cite "The American Bulletin", (examples, although some cite a different date).

Just a glance at the masthead of the American Bulletin, hammers home the point that it's not anything even approaching a reliable source. Some of the issues of this publication from 1935 and 1936 can be viewed on this website, but unfortunately not the May 15th or May 5th, 1935 editions, the two cited for the origin of the "Some call it Marxism/communism I call it Judaism." quote.

So I apologise to the late Rabbi Wise for claiming he said "Some call it Marxism I call it Judaism", because it's virtually certain, he never did say that. Although, as previously mentioned, it's one-hundred-percent certain, he did say: "As a Jew I want Jews to do all they can, and more than they can, for the Soviet Union and its peoples".

(Update: Oct 16, 2012: A 1955 magazine attributes the quote to a different Rabbi Wise, Isaac M. Wise).

Ehrenburg on Fox News Channel

One of those rare occasions when Jewish-Bolshevik-Zionist Ilya Ehrenburg wrote something which is actually true:

"I know how badly informed the average American is about everything, what's happening or what has happened outside the U.S.A."

Synagogues built under the Bolsheviks

"the more representatives of the reactionary clergy we manage to shoot, the better."

- Vladimir "Lenin" Ulyanov, March 19, 1922

According to the late Alexander Yakovlev, who was himself a senior member of the Politburo; over 200,000 members of the Christian clergy were killed in the Soviet Union. Mostly shot, but many were crucified, buried alive, scalped, or murdered in other horrifyingly sadistic methods. According to American scholar Michael P. Riccards, each day, Lenin insisted on personally checking the death lists of murdered clergy.

By 1928, the Bolsheviks had destroyed, closed, or converted for other uses; 37.5% of the 48,000 parishes of the Russian Orthodox Church. By 1939, it was over 99%. During the Wehrmacht's initial success following the June 22, 1941 invasion of the Soviet Union, Stalin did permit thousands of churches to reopen (under the guidance of Party approved clergy) in an attempt to placate his long oppressed populace. But following the war, under first Stalin and even into Khrushchev's reign, the churches were once again closed in their thousands.

Yakovlev, in his 2002 book A Century of Violence in Soviet Russia, does claim that only Stalin's death in March 1953, prevented the planned expulsion of Jews from major industrial centres in Russia, and that Stalin closed synagogues. Although an article which appeared in The Washington Times (Nov 28, 1995), cites Yakovlev as claiming; that in 1969, only 14.6% of the churches in the Soviet Union still remained open, "and Jewish religious buildings were destroyed in similar proportion." But this is unlikely. Yakovlev does have a 15 page chapter entitled "Anti-Semitism" in his aforementioned book, devoted almost an entirely to post-WW2 anti-Zionism in the Soviet Union, but he does not state that Jewish religious buildings were destroyed in "similar proportion" to the churches.

In 1927, when the Bolhseviks were busy destroying churches and slaughtering the clergy, in their attempts to complete destroy Christianity in the Soviet Union, they were allowing Jews to build new synagogues, according to Rabbi Jacob Minkin, of New York City's prestigious Temple Beth El, writing in his weekly column The Jewish World, published in the Syacuse Herald Magazine:

No Fear for Jews in Soviet Russia

At a meeting of Jewish literati in Warsaw at which the subject of discussion was the Jewish colonies in Soviet Russia, some highly interesting facts regarding the Jews in these colonies came to light.

It was originally the desire of the Soviet government to obliterate all traces of religion from these colonists. But it has had to forego this intention, due to the persistency of the Jews in clinging to their religion.

It is strange, indeed, to visit the houses of these Jews and find on one side of the room a portrait of Lenin and on the other side a holy ark with scrolls, Bibles and sets of Talmud. It is also interesting to note that, as as soon as these Jews become communially established, they begin to reorganize their religious life by importing Hebrew teachers to instruct their children. In the richer colonies they are even building synagogues. In the poorer colonies they gather for divine worship in private houses as their fathers did of yore.

In Crimea, Mongolia, and other Soviet strongholds, we find the same situation obtaining. These holy arks in the houses of the Jews, rising as they do almost to the ceiling, parallel to the portrait on the opposite wall, stand, there as a challenge to Lenin and his atheism. The tradition and social heritage of the Jew can withstand the attack of fanatical godlessness, even as it withstood those bigotries and superstitions of old.

Indoctrinating the Holocaust

"The Archbishop himself explained to us why the Church has such powers, and why it strives to keep the education of children in the hands of the clergy. He knows how important it is to impart religious instruction to young people, who are incapable of forming a reasoned judgment on the subject in which they are instructed, and who take on trust the teaching of their elders. The clergy know very well what is the result of ramming into the heads of children from seven years old upwards the ideas for which (Archbishop) Cieplak stands; by this means they catch them fast from tender years in tentacles of religion," 

— Closing Address of Public Prosecutor Nikolai Krylenko
— March 21—25, 1923, Bolshevik show trial of Roman Catholic Archbishop Jan Cieplak in Moscow source

photo source - captured page

You're not supposed to know that yet

This trustworthy looking fella, is David Arnold Croll née Davud Avrum Croll (1900 - 1990), a Russian born Jew who emigrated to Canada as a young boy, and would grow up to be a politician, and a Zionist. During his speech on October 8, 1945, at a meeting of 10,000 Zionists converged in and around Massey Hall in Toronto, Croll stated:

"Let the world not forget that the Jews were the first people who fought the Nazis, and suffered; who bore the brunt of the vicious persecution and who lost 6,000,000 souls, more than was lost by all the Allied armies during the war"

The Canadian Jewish Chronicle - Oct 12, 1945 - p.6

What's peculiar, is that it wasn't revealed that 6,000,000 Jews had been killed, until more than two months after Croll made his speech.

Saskatoon Star-Phoenix - Dec 14, 1945 - p.1

What's even more peculiar, is that Croll wasn't the only Zionist to know 6,000,000 Jews had been killed before (s)he was supposed to. Lots of them did.

1919: Six Million Jews once more in peril

The Pittsburgh Gazette Times - Oct 5, 1919, section 6, p.16

1930: Will Raise $6,000,000 for Palestine

The Daily Times (PA), March 15, 1930, p.5

Meet the SixMillionaire Boy's Club 

(six million madness from the seven men pictured)

Nathan Straus, mega-shopkeeper and mega-Zionist, warned in 1919; six million Jews are in peril

Felix M. Warburg, mega-banker, warned in 1914, 1919 and 1936; six million Jews are in peril

Herbert H. Lehman, Democrat, warned in 1931; six million Jews are in peril

William M. Lewis, judge, Zionist, warned in 1938; six million Jews are in peril

David M. Bressier, in 1926, needed another $6,000,000 for Jews in peril

Morris Rothenberg, warned in 1939; six million Jews are in peril

Paul Baerwald, warned in 1939; six million Jews are in peril

Rabbi Wise: Jews must keep their race separate

The article claims Wise was "of the Church of the Messiah" (Unitarians, who don't accept that Jesus was God), which was a mistake by the article's author. But Wise was very closely connected to John Haynes Holmes of the Church of the Messiah, so much so, there was even a book written about their relationship. Holmes, incidentally, was an early and vocal supporter of the Bolshevik regime in Russia.

Photo of Harry Waton, Jewish-Marxist-Kabbalist

After searching through several hundred newspapers, I finally managed to find a photograph of Dr. Harry Waton, the American Jewish Marxist and Kabbalist, who claimed "Judaism gave birth to Marxism", "Marxism will rule the world", "Jews have a right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the masters over the whole earth. Now, indeed, this is the historic destiny of the Jews", "Judaism is communism", and "Jews will conquer the world and the human race."

I knew that Waton was a prolific author, but I was shocked by how many lectures the man gave. The archives of the Marxist newspaper The New York Call, can be searched for free on the staggeringly brilliant New York newspaper archive fultonhistory.com. In The New York Call, I found adverts for hundreds of lectures and classes in Marxism Waton gave, just a few are reproduced below, along with a couple of adverts for two of his many books.

here for enlarged version

God worked thru Theodor Herzl

Charles Taze Russell, the founder of what's now known as the Jehovah's Witness cult, was invited to speak by New York Jews to 4,000 Hebrews at the Hippodrome in New York on October 9, 1910. Russell accepted the invitation, and told the assembled Jews during his address; that Zionism is from God, sent through Theodore Herzl (an agnostic), that the gentile governments of this world are destined to be succeeded by the Messiah, and the Jews, God's chosen people, will come to the forefront in world affairs, and be the representatives and instruments among men, of the Messiah's kingdom.

Goering's Closing Statement

Video still of Goering about to make his final statement to the IMT

Heavily edited footage with subtitles & translations here.

Closing statement of Reichsmarschall Herman Goering to the International Military Tribunal, August 31, 1946

The Prosecution, in the final speeches, has treated the defendants and their testimony as completely worthless. The statements made under oath by the defendants were accepted as absolutely true when they could serve to support the Indictment, but conversely the statements were characterized as perjury when they refuted the Indictment. That is very elementary, but it is not a convincing basis for demonstration of proof.

The Prosecution uses the fact that I was the second man of the State as proof that I must have known everything that happened. But it does not present any documentary or other convincing proof in cases where I have denied under oath that I knew about certain things, much less desired them. Therefore, it is only an allegation and a conjecture when the Prosecution says, "Who should have known that if not Goering, who was the successor of the Fuehrer?"

Repeatedly we have heard here how the worst crimes were veiled with the most secrecy. I wish to state expressly that I condemn these terrible mass murders to the utmost, and cannot understand them in the least. But I should like to state clearly once more before the High Tribunal, that I have never decreed the murder of a single individual at any time, and neither did I decree any other atrocities or tolerate them, while I had the power and the knowledge to prevent them.

The new allegation presented by Mr. Dodd in his final speech, that I had ordered Heydrich to kill the Jews, lacks every proof and is not true either. There is not a single order signed by me or signed in my behalf that enemy fliers should be shot or turned over to the SD. And not a single case has been established where units of my Luftwaffe carried out things like that.

The Prosecution has repeatedly submitted some documents which contain alleged statements, reported and written down at third and fourth hand, without my having previously seen these statements in order to correct erroneous ideas or to preclude misunderstandings.

How easily completely distorted reports can arise from third hand notes is also proven, among other things, by the stenographic transcript of these court sessions, which often needed correction when checked.

The Prosecution brings forward individual statements over a period of 25 years, which were made under completely different circumstances and without any consequences arising from them at the time, and quotes them as proof of intent and guilt, statements which can easily be made in the excitement of the moment and of the atmosphere that prevailed at the time. There is probably not one leading personage on the opposing side who did not speak or write similarly in the course of a quarter of a century.

Out of all the happenings of these 25 years, from conferences, speeches, laws, actions, and decisions, the Prosecution proves that everything was desired and intended from the beginning according to a deliberate sequence and an unbroken connection. This is an erroneous conception which is entirely devoid of logic, and which will be rectified some day by history, after the proceedings here have proved the incorrectness of these allegations.

Mr. Jackson in his final speech points, out the fact that the signatory states are still in a state of war with Germany, and that because of the unconditional surrender merely a state of truce prevails now. Now, international law is uniform. The same must apply to both sides. Therefore, if everything which is being done in Germany today on the part of the occupying powers is admissible under international law, then German was formerly in the same position, at least as regards France, Holland, Belgium, Norway, Yugoslavia and Greece. If today the Geneva Convention no longer has any validity so far as Germans are concerned, if today in all parts of Germany industry is being dismantled and other great assets in all spheres can be carried away to the other states, if today the property of millions of Germans is being confiscated and many other serious infringements on freedom and property are taking place, then measures such as those taken by Germany in the countries mentioned above cannot have been criminal according to international law either.

Mr. Jackson stated further that one cannot accuse and punish a state, but rather that one must hold the leaders responsible. One seems to forget that Germany was a sovereign state, and that her legislation within the German nation was not subject to the jurisdiction of foreign countries. No state ever gave notice to the Reich at the proper time, pointing out that any activity for National Socialism would be made subject to punishment and persecution. On the other hand, if we, the leaders as individuals, are called to account and condemned--very well; but you cannot punish the German people at the same time. The German people placed their trust in the Fuehrer, and under his authoritarian government they had no influence on events. Without knowledge of the grave crimes which have become known today, the people, loyal, self-sacrificing, and courageous, fought and suffered through the life-and-death struggle which had broken out against their will. The German people are free of guilt.

I did not want a war, nor did I bring it about. I did everything to prevent it by negotiations. After it had broken out, I did everything to assure victory. Since the three greatest powers on earth, together with many other nations, were fighting against us, we finally succumbed to their tremendous superiority.

I stand up for the things that I have done, but I deny most emphatically that my actions were dictated by the desire to subjugate foreign peoples by wars, to murder them, to rob them, or to enslave them, or to commit atrocities or crimes.

The only motive which guided me was my ardent love for my people, its happiness, its freedom, and its life. And for this I call on the Almighty and my German people to witness.

IMT BS V.22, p.366 - 368

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/08-31-46.asp

"New light thrown on capture of Hoess"

Chanced across the article below on the Association of Jewish Refugees website, it reveals that a Jewish soldier named Hanns Alexander was involved in the capture of former Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Hoess on the night of March 11th/12th 1946 in Gottrupel, near to the German/Danish border.

Alexander had left Germany for Britain in 1937 aged 19, and by the end of WW2 was a member of a British army intelligence unit. This article claims that Hanns Alexander was in charge of Hoess' capture.

Hanns Alexander's presence at the capture of of Hoess isn't mentioned in The Commandant (Maverick, 2008), by British historian Ian Baxter. It's the latest authoritative account of Hoess' capture and interrogation, although Baxter also neglected to mention the role of Vera Atkins, and even Gerald Draper in Hoess' interrogation. Baxter does confirm a "Captain Alexander of the No.1 War Crimes Investigation team" took charge of Hoess on March 15th, and transported him from Heide to Minden ("camp Tomato" is a new term though), where on March 16th, following more physical abuse, Hoess signed a confession written in English. A language, Baxter claims—contradicting Holocaust lore, i.e. Hoess' memoirs, Robert Jan van Pelt, and Prof. Richard Evans—Hoess didn't understand (p.180). 

Jun 2012 Journal

New light thrown on capture of Hoess

Untold details about the tracking down and arrest of Rudolf Hoess, the notorious Kommandant of Auschwitz, were revealed when a Belsize Square Synagogue group travelled to Cracow just after Passover.

A quick search on Wikipedia gives the outlines of Hoess’s final years. But there are no names, just the mention of his capture by ‘British troops - some of whom were born in Germany - on 11 March 1946’.

Now, we have a name: the late Hanns Alexander. Members of Hanns’s family were among the 35 Synagogue members on the trip, led by Rabbi Stuart Altshuler and Professor Antony Polonsky, who holds the chair of Holocaust Studies at Brandeis University, Massachusetts. Hanns’s daughter, Annette Hughes, made the journey, as did his nephew, Frank Harding, with his wife Belinda and son Thomas.

On the short coach trip from Cracow to the sombre guided tour of Auschwitz, several of the party explained their own personal links to the site: grandparents lost, a last-minute escape from Germany. Thomas Harding told the group about his research on his great-uncle, which began at Hanns’s funeral in 2006.

Hanns Alexander was 19 when he left his native Berlin for Britain - he flew into Croydon airport in 1937. The rest of his family - twin brother, two older sisters and parents - came separately. As soon as war was declared he volunteered for the army and, like most German-Jewish refugees, was accepted into the Pioneer Corps, mainly digging trenches.

But by the end of war he had been moved to Intelligence and, again like many other German-speaking Jewish refugee soldiers, he was sent to Germany to act as interpreter. Only in his case there was a very specific task.

In Germany he joined a group of British soldiers, Jewish and non-Jewish, intent on finding the ruthlessly efficient Hoess. As the Red Army approached from the east to liberate the 20,000-acre Auschwitz complex, Hoess had sent his wife and five children home from the comfortable villa they occupied on the edge of the site, and then quietly slipped away. The British team went to Hoess’s wife and threatened her with handing over her oldest son to the Russians unless she revealed her husband’s whereabouts.

Under pressure Hedwig Hoess gave the location where her husband was working as a farmer under the assumed name of Franz Lang. He was living in a barn. After he had been severely beaten and confessed to his true identity, Hanns Alexander arrested him and handed him over to the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, where he gave the first authoritative and detailed account of the entire camp operation. Senior Nazis on trial could no longer claim ignorance of the extermination policy and its implementation.

Hoess was then handed over to the Polish authorities, who tried him in Warsaw for murder and hanged him on 16 April 1947 on the same spot in view of his villa (now occupied by a retired teacher) where prisoners of Auschwitz were publicly hanged.

After demobilisation, Mr Alexander went into a career in banking, mainly at S. G. Warburg and under successive takeovers. His story, intertwined with a study of Rudolf Hoess, is being written for publication by his great-nephew, Thomas Harding. ‘There were rumours in the family about Hanns’s being a war crimes investigator but nobody really knew,’ Thomas said:

The first time I heard it mentioned was at his funeral in 2006. Most people doubted this was true and put it down to one of his tales. The search for the truth was what got me going on my book, and it was not until I started my research, and found confirmation in the British, American and Polish archives, including Hanns’s field dispatches, that I was able to confirm that Hanns was indeed the man who arrested Rudolf Hoess.

He had backup, particularly Field Security Section 92, but Hanns had been charged by the War Crimes Group to arrest Hoess, and it was Hanns who carried out the arrest. He also delivered him to Camp Tomato, the interrogation centre, where Hoess made his first confession about Auschwitz and the millions who had been murdered there.

But, as his daughter confirmed: ‘Dad was very reluctant to talk about his wartime activities. The past was the past. He was grateful to England for giving him another chance in life.’

Ruth Rothenberg

http://www.ajr.org.uk/journal/issue.Jun12/article.10512

"Dr. Mengele School Project"

This is funny, especially his experiment at 1 min in

"This is Hannah's and Madisyn's school project for 6th grade."

youtube

1921: Six Million Jews, a propagandist's guide

"The position of the Jew in Europe today is highly precarious. There are about six million Jews in Central and Eastern Europe outside of Soviet Russia. The great outstanding fact to remember in connection with this Jewish population is that it is a city and town population. They are a people who depend upon trade, commerce and industry for their livelihood. They are rarely producers of food. The collapse of the economic structure in Middle Europe has made even money valueless. Their condition is not different from what it was 800 years ago when barter was the universal manner of transacting business. Today in many parts of Europe food can be obtained only by giving to the peasants in return for it, furniture, clothing and finished products."

Above is the cover and an extract from a pamphlet apparently issued in 1921 for members of American Jewish Distribution Committee, filled with "Facts to Talk About" during public meetings. A pdf of the full pamphlet can be view here.

"HOW THE CASH COMES IN"

"This poster, featuring a famous Jewish War Relief cartoon drawn by J. N. Ding, of the New York Tribune, appeared on lamp posts through out the principal business and residential streets of St. Louis during the recent Jewish War Relief campaign, when $325,000 was subscribed. Persons who saw it declared it was one of the most effective means of bringing home an appeal they had ever witnessed. The same idea was carried out in Savannah, Ga, during its recent campaign."

This photograph and  caption, appeared in the June 1, 1920 edition

(Vol. 1, No.3) of Jewish Relief News, a pdf copy viewable here

Amazing 1908 speech on America's enemy within

Knute Nelson (1843 - 1923), Senator for Minnesota for 28 years

Prophetic speech from Senator Nelson, made on Friday, August 14, 1908, at the Luther League of America's eight annual convention in Chicago. Almost everything he warned against, has happened, in triplicate.

"Severed by two vast oceans from the other great powers of the world, with our hundred millions of people and our almost limitless resources, we have no occasion to fear any attack or invasion from abroad. The enemy that will attack us and and the danger that will threaten us, against which we most constantly be on our guard, will come from within; will come when we are untrue and unfaithful to our great trust and duty; will come when we cease to pass good laws and when we cease to enforce the laws without fear or favor against the rich and poor, the high and the low; will come when we grant immunity to transgressors and law violators; will come when we allow the mammon of pelf and unrighteousness to rule and dominate; will come when we stifle or permit to be stifled the conscience of the masses of the nation."

Senator Nelson went on to say that only the schools and the churches can save the U.S. from the enemy within. Unfortunately the "enemy within" seemingly knew this too, hence; Christian Zionism (perfect example), and No Child Left Behind.

Incidentally, just 11 years after making this speech; in February and March of 1919, Senator Nelson was part of the U.S. Subcommittee on "Bolshevik Propaganda", which was told repeatedly by Americans who had been in Russia during the Bolshevik revolution, that the Bolshevik leaders were predominately Jews from the United States, particularly from the NYC's Lower East Side. 

1930: Jewish bankers financing Austrian antisemities

"The political Zionists ... they call upon Jews to leave Europe and to found a state of their own; preferably in Palestine,"

- Public Opinion: A Weekly Journal, September 9, 1897

"It would be an excellent idea to call in respectable, accredited anti-Semities as liquidators of property. ... The anti-Semities will become our most dependable friends, the anti-Semitic countries our allies."

- Theodor Herzl, Diary, June 12, 1895

This is Dr. Robert Danneberg (wiki), the Austrian Jewish socialist politician. He was arrested by the Nazis immediately following Anschluss, although they did allow his wife and children to leave Austria for London. The Nazis also permitted Danneberg to write to his wife whilst he was being held prisoner in their concentration camps. He died ("was killed") in Auschwitz on approximately December 12, 1942.

Back in 1930, during a visit to the United States, Danneberg—who was then president of the Vienna Landtag—told a journalist from the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, that Jewish bankers in Austria, were financing Heimwehr.

http://cdn.jta.org/archive_pdfs/1930/1930-07-30_1725.pdf