Thursday, 31 May 2012
photograph from The Arizona Republic, December 25, 1966, p.35
Elie Wiesel wrote the following, it appears in an 1978 book¹, but can be read in full in a 1985 newspaper article².
"You will not understand, you will never understand," were the words heard everywhere during the reign of night. I can only echo them. You, who never lived under a sky of blood, will never know what it was like. Even if you read all the books ever written, even if you listen to all the testimonies ever given, you will remain on this side of the wall, you will view the agony and death of a people from afar, through the screen of a memory that is not your own. An admission of impotence and guilt? I do not know. All I know is that Treblinka and Auschwitz cannot be told. And yet I have tried. God knows I have tried. Have I attempted too much or not enough? Among some 25 volume, only three or four penetrate the phantsmagoric realm of the dead. In my other books, through my other books, I have tried to follow other roads. For it is dangerous to linger among the dead, they hold onto you and you run the risk of speaking only to them.
- Elie Wiesel
1. Wiesel, Elie: Why I Write. In: Rosenfeld, A. H. Greenberg, I. Green, B. Confronting the Holocaust. The Impact of Elie Wiesel. Indiana University Press. 1978. pp.203-204.
2. Ottawa Citizen - Apr 27, 1985, p.B1
2. Ottawa Citizen - Apr 27, 1985, p.B1
Wednesday, 30 May 2012
The Republicans are controlled by the House of Warburg, which is controlled by the House of Rothschild.
The Democrats are dominated by Kuhn, Loeb & Co., who are controlled by the House of Rothschild.
Posted by The Black Rabbit of Inlé at 14:05
In February 1933 Wilhelm Frick, member of the NSDAP and German Minister of the Interior, was interviewed by Dutch-Canadian journalist Pierrer van Paassen, who put it to Frick:"Moreover, anyone who care to investigate Jewish life but superficially soon discovers that instead of an indissoluble international solidarity as you claim, the same lines that divide society in classes operate in Jewish life. The best proof probably is that several Jewish bankers are backing Herr Hitler financially and that a Jewish bank is backing Prince Starhenberg in Austria. Since you say you are going to act strongly against the Jews, these Jewish banks are indirectly your aids. How can you speak of Jewish solidarity under the circumstance?"
Van Paassen clearly couldn't have got a proper answer from Frick:
Posted by The Black Rabbit of Inlé at 13:08
1915: "at the end of the holocaust the Jews and Palestine will be more closely related than at present."
Jacob de Hass (1872 - 1937) was a British Hasidic Jew, a journalist, and a prominent early Zionist leader. He emigrated to the United States in 1902 and won some very important converts to the Zionist movement. He also admitted that: "the Semite must conquer the world, that the Jew must master humanity before it could attain to the higher flights of civilization."
In 1915, he contributed to a huge propaganda piece with other leading Zionists for The Boston Sunday Globe, in which he wrote:What has been in process in Israel these 40 years—a process not of accident but of design—is related to the old conception of destiny—restoration to Palestine. The Jews, to the number of 44,000 have a foothold in the country, and, what is equally important, their rights to Zion are equally important, their rights to Zion are among the few things that all writers on every phase of the war—pro-Ally or pro-German—admit. Indeed the only point that all warring elements are agreed upon is that at the end of the holocaust the Jews and Palestine will be more closely related than at present.
- Jacob de Hass, editor of the Jewish Advocate, and Zionist, The Boston Sunday Globe, September 26, 1915
Posted by The Black Rabbit of Inlé at 08:01
Tuesday, 29 May 2012
Wallace Ranking Deuel (1905 - 1974) on the cover of The Saturday Review of Literature (Feb 7, 1942),
which was obviously hyping Wallace R. Deuel's new book People Under Hitler, in which he wrote:
which was obviously hyping Wallace R. Deuel's new book People Under Hitler, in which he wrote:
Das Schwarze Korfs, official organ of the SS and the police, reported in March of 1937 that when the nazis came to power they found that approximately 2,000,000 men belonged to homosexual clubs and associations of one kind or another in the Reich. Even pederasty was organized in Germany.
Wallace R. Deuel (supposedly a non-Jew 1) was a Chicago-born political scientist who worked at the American University in Beirut between 1916 - 1929, and from 1934 - 1941 was a correspondent in Berlin for the Chicago Daily News 2 (so was surely a fluent German speaker). He wrote anti-German books 3, many anti-German newspaper articles 4, anti-German radio plays 5, and even advised Walt Disney on anti-German propaganda cartoons 6. In 1942 he joined the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) as special assistant to OSS's director William J. Donovan. From 1954 - 1968 Deuel held numerous senior positions in the CIA in which he oversaw propaganda, and he was also the CIA representative at the White House during the Kennedy administration. 7
The article below reports on a lecture Deuel gave in Maryland on March 22, 1943. It reads:"The Nazis set out in the beginning to destroy whole peoples. They expected to obliterate from the earth not less than 6,000,000 Jews as a beginning."
1. Southwestern Jewish Press, November 18, 1949, page 3, Ida Nasatir book review—People Under Hitler by Wallace Deuel.
2. Smith, W. Thomas. Encyclopedia of the Central Intelligence Agency. New York: Infobase Publishing. 2003. p.74
3. Hitler and Nazi Germany Uncensored (1941) a collection of Deule's articles for The Chicago Daily News. People Under Hitler, NY: Harcourt Brace & Co. (1942).
4. I made two searches for "William R. Deuel" and "William Deuel" on googlenews' archives. I found a huge number of articles by him, in many different newspapers.
5. WOR Thursday, May 20, 1943. 8-8:30: This is Our Enemy, play by Wallace Deuel. pdf copy of schedule
6. Smith, W. Thomas. Encyclopedia of the Central Intelligence Agency. New York: Infobase Publishing. 2003. p.74
7. Ibid. p.74
Posted by The Black Rabbit of Inlé at 15:06
Posted by The Black Rabbit of Inlé at 10:04
Monday, 28 May 2012
"... the poet was the first to call attention to the future of Socialism."
German-Jewish poet Heinrich Heine (1797-1856) and his friend,
German-Jewish banker James (Jacob) de Rothschild (1792-1868).
Both portraits are the work of Jewish artist Moritz Oppenheim (1800-1882),
who was commissioned to paint many portraits of the Rothschild family.
- Heinrich Heine was a distant relation and a very good friend of Karl Marx (1818-1883), he once saved the life of Marx's infant daughter Jenny.
- Heine was also friends with Karl Marx's close relations, the Rothschild banking dynasty.
- An admirer of Heine's work was Jacob Schiff (1847-1856), the Frankfurt-born, Jewish banker, whose grandfather had shared a home (the so-called: House at the Green Shield) with James de Rothschild's father in Frankfurt Judengasse (Jews' Alley).
- A highly symbolic line from a Heine poem was found written upon a wall of the cellar in which the Russian Czar and his family were murdered in 1918. It's probable the author had attended a lecture course on Heine's work held in New York in early 1914, which was financed by Jacob Schiff.
Following is an anecdote (dating from at least 1865) about Heine dining with James de Rothschild, and a quip the former wrote (in 1841) of one of his many visits to the latter:"BARON JAMES ROTHSCHILD had, like his brother Nathan, the reputation of being a boor — or brute, socially ; at any rate, when he took a whim to be. He seemed, when in this mood, to delight in showing off his parvenu vulgarity, and assumed the airs of a nabob with every one for whom he did not particularly care. ... Having quizzed the poet Heine once rather sharply, at dinner, the latter betrayed his host into some remark on the name of the wine they were drinking — Lacrima Christi. 'Curious name — I can't account for it,' said the millionnaire. 'Oh !' replied the wit, 'the etymology is very simple ; Christ weeps that Jews should drink such excellent wine!'"
"I (Heinrich Heine) like best to visit him (James de Rothschild) at the offices of his bank, where I can observe as a philosopher how the people, and not only God's people, but also all others bow and scrape before him. They do such a twisting and turning of their spines as would make the best of acrobats be hard put to it. I saw people who shivered when they approached the great Baron as though they had touched a Voltaic pile. At the very door of his office many of them were seized by an awful shuddering, such as Moses felt when he stood on the holy ground of Horeb. And just as Moses then took off his shoes, so many a broker or agent de change would take off his boots before daring to enter the private office of Herr von Rothschild, if he were not afraid that his feet would smell and so incommode the Herr Baron. That private office is, indeed, a remarkable place which excites noble thoughts and sentiments, like the sight of the ocean or the starry Heavens : we see in that office how small is man, and how great is God ! For money is the God of our time, and Rothschild is his prophet.
Several years ago, once when I wanted to see Herr Rothschild, a liveried servant carried his chamber pot across the corridor, and a speculator who happened to pass at the same moment took of his hat reverently to the might pot. So far, I say it with all respect, goes the respect of certain people. I made a note of the name of that devout man, and I am convinced that in time he will be a millionaire."
"I do not know, but I think that at last the head of the great water-snake (England)
will be crushed, and the skin pulled over the head of the bear of the North (Russia)."
- Heinrich Heine, friend of the James de Rothschild & Karl Marx on what Communism will achieve
Karl Marx and Heinrich Heine supposedly first meet in Paris in December 1843. Marx had just turned 24 years-of-age, Heine was 45, a famous poet and foreign correspondent, whose articles appeared frequently in the Prussian and Bavarian press. A year-and-a-half before their first meeting, in June and July 1842 Heinrich Heine was predicting the horrifying future of "communism" in his regularly letters (published anonymously) for the Bavarian newspaper Augsburger Zeitung.
Heine wrote June 20th, 1842:
(Prominent French politician) Guizot has only one foe to fear — that foe is the later Gnizot, the Guizot of Communism, who has not as yet come forth, but who certainly will come, and be as unterrified and unselfish as the Thought; for even as that doctrinaire identified himself with the system of the bourgeois régime so this one will unite with that of agrarian rule, and consequence oppose consequence. It will be a terrible combat.
The fearful wheel would again begin to turn, and we should see an adversary appear who would be the most alarming of all who have ever entered the lists. This antagonist as yet preserves his terrible incognito, and lives as yet like a poor pretender in that ground-floor or cellar of official society, in those catacombs where the new life germinates and buds. Communism is the name of the terrible antagonist which sets agrarian rule in all its consequences in opposition to the bourgeois régime of to-day. It will be a terrible conflict — how will it end? That the gods and goddesses only know who know the future. This much do we know, that Communism, though it be at present but little discussed, and now yearns away its life in forgotten garrets on wretched straw-pallets, is still the gloomy hero to whom a great if transitory part is assigned in the modern tragedy, and which only waits its cue (Stichwort réplique) to enter on the stage. We should never lose sight of this actor, and we will from time to time give accounts of the secret rehearsals in which he is preparing for his débût. Such indications are perhaps more important than reports of electoral intrigues, party quarrels, and cabinet intrigues.
The Works of Heinrich Heine Volume VIII. Translated from the German by Charles Godfrey Leland (Hans Breitmann). London: William Heinemann. 1893. pp.297-302.
Heine wrote July 12th, 1842:
What would be the end of this movement (Communism) for which Paris has, as usual, given the signal? It would be a war, the most terrible war of destruction, which — more's the pity ! — will call the noblest races of civilisation into the arena, to their joint destruction. I mean Germany and France. England, the great sea-serpent, which can always glide back into its watery nest, and Russia, which in its vast forests of firs, steppes, and ice-fields has also the securest lairs — these two cannot be utterly destroyed in a common political war, even by the most decided defeats; but Germany is, in such a case, in far greater danger, and even France may suffer terribly in her political existence. But this would be, so to speak, only the first act or prologue to the grand drama. The second will be the European or the world Revolution, the gigantic battle of the disinherited with the inheritors of fortune, and in that there will be no question of nationality or of religion, for there will be but one fatherland, the Earth, and but one religion, that of happiness in this life. Will the religious doctrines of the past in every country unite to a desperate resistance, and thus form a third act in the great play ? Or will the old Absolute tradition enter again on the stage, but this time in a new costume and with new watchwords to incite and goad? How will this drama end? I do not know, but I think that at last the head of the great water-snake will be crashed, and the skin pulled over the head of the bear of the North. And then perhaps there will be only one flock and one shepherd — a free shepherd with an iron crook — and one great herd of men all shorn and all bleating alike. Wild and gloomy times come roaring on, and the prophet who would write a new Apocalypse must imagine new beasts, and those so terrible that the old symbols of St. John as compared to them will seem like soft doves and amorets. The gods hide their faces out of pity to the sons of mankind, their nurslings for so many years, and perhaps out of fear as to their own fate. The future has an odour as of Russian leather, blood, blasphemy, and much beating with the knout. I advise our descendants to come into the world with thick skins.
Incidentally, the "great sea serpent", supposedly a real leviathan, was "seen again" in 1848. Perhaps this was a cause célèbre during the mid-nineteenth century, and explains Heine's reference.
Posted by The Black Rabbit of Inlé at 09:32
Sunday, 27 May 2012
Saturday, 26 May 2012
This book was published in 1912, written by James Boyle (1853-1939), born in England, but emigrated to the United States when he was 17 years old. He was the Private Secretary to William McKinley, Governor of Ohio, who later becamer 25th U.S. President. Boyle was later the American consul to the British city of Liverpool.
Boyle, James. What is Socialism. New York: The Shakespeare Press. 1912. p.281.
Posted by The Black Rabbit of Inlé at 17:52
Friday, 25 May 2012
Below is a page from the 1897-1898 Year Book of the 8th Annual Central Conference of American Rabbis, it's an extract of an article by Lithuanian Jew and scholar Dr. Max Margolis.
He calls it "the kingdom of the righteousness" and "the kingdom of God", but it is more commonly referred to as the "new world order."
Year Book of the Central Conference of American Rabbis, Vol. VIII. Cincinnati: May & Kreidler. 1898. p.4-5.
Nice letter from Mr. G. M. Beerbower of Hollywood, Florida, published in the Miami News:
"Nothing but almost complete extermination of the savage
whites will insure peace on earth and goodwill toward men."
Posted by The Black Rabbit of Inlé at 18:52
The Delegation to Jerusalem, 1898.
I've previously posted here on President of the Zionist Organisation, Lithuanian Jew David Wolffsohn (2nd in from the right), telling the Eighth Zionist Congress that the Jewish people must yet conquer the world. I've now found an article in The Nation, from September 1907 about Wolffsohn's threat. It insisted that he meant conquer the world spiritually, but went on to say that the Jews can hardly mumble about the occasional pogrom, if they see their mission as divinely inspired:The president of the Hague congress is reported to have brought its sessions to a close with the fervent utterance that Israel would yet conquer the world. The conquest, of course, is to be a spiritual one. It is the same position taken by Mr. Zangwill in the years of his earlier enthusiasm, when he exalted the role of Israel as a prophet among the nations and wanted a new Jewish kingdom in Asiatic Turkey as a refuge and defence against persecution. Now, it is a fair argument to advance that if the Jewish race really aspires to the role of missionary among the peoples of the earth, it must not object to the incidentals that go with the exercise of a divine mission. The prophet has never had an easy time of it, and the priest is not supposed to hanker after the pleasures of home life, or quiet, or rest from labor. Viewed from this point, events like Kishenev or Blalystok are not the crimes usually considered, but the inevitable consequences of such a role as Jewish millennial champions look forward to. If a Jewish state is really to be founded, it must be done on a practical, and not on a Messianic basis.
Zionist leader Nahum Sokolow, wrote in his 1919 book History of Zionism of how the Russian Revolution gave Zionism a great stimulus.
Sokolow, Nahum. The History of Zionism 1600-1918 Volume II. London: Longmans, Green & Co. 1919. p.38.
Posted by The Black Rabbit of Inlé at 11:38
Thursday, 24 May 2012
"What then is, generally speaking, the truth of history? A fable agreed upon."
Amazing quote on how authorised history is always a fable, made on November 20, 1816,
when Napoleon was being held prisoner by the British on St. Helena in the South Atlantic:
"It must be admitted, my dear Las Cases, it is most difficult to obtain absolute certainties for the purposes of history. Fortunately it is, in general, more a matter of mere curiosity than or real importance. There are so many kinds of truth! The truth which Fouche, or other intriguers of his stamp, will tell, for instance ; even that which many very honest people may tell, will, in some cases, differ essentially from the truth which I may relate. The truth of history, so much in request, to which every body eagerly appeals, is too often but a word. At the time of the events, during the heat of conflicting passions, it cannot exist ; and if, at a later period, all parties are agreed respecting it, it is because those persons who were interested in the events, those who might be able to contradict what is asserted, are no more. What then is, generally speaking, the truth of history? A fable agreed upon. As it has been very ingeniously remarked, there are, in these matters, two essential points, very distinct from each other : the postitive facts, and the moral intentions. With respect to the positive facts, it would seem that they ought to be incontrovertible ; yet you will not find two accounts agreeing together in relating the same fact : some have remained contested points to this day, and will ever remain so. With regard to moral intentions, how shall we judge of them, even admitting the candour of those who relate events? And what will be the case if the narrators be not sincere, or if they should be actuated by interested or passions? I have given an order, but who was able to read my thoughts, my real intentions? Yet every one will take up that order, and measure it according to his own scale, or adapt it to his own plans or system. See the different colourings that will be given to it by the intriguer, whose plans it disturbs or favours : see how he will distort it. The man who assumes importance, to whom the ministers or the sovereign may have hinted something in confidence on the subject, will do the same thing ; as will the numerous idlers of the palance, who, having nothing better to do than to listen under windows, and invent when they have not heard. And each person will be so certain of what he tells! and the inferior classes of people, who will have received their information from these privileged individuals, will be so certain, in their turn, of its correctness! and then memoirs are digested, memoranda are written, witticism and anecdotes are circulated ; and of such materials is history composed! ... here again we have the admitted fable, which will be called history. Nor can it be otherwise. It is true that as there are many, they will be far from agreeing together."
Las Cases, Emmanuel-Auguste-Dieudonné. Mémorial de Sainte Hélène: Journal of the Private Life and Conversations
of the Emperor Napoleon at Saint Helena, Volume 4. London: Henry Colburn & Co. 1823. pp.251-252 & 256.
Posted by The Black Rabbit of Inlé at 20:30
Magnes, Judah Leon. The Jewish Community of New York City. 1909. p.3.
It seems that he was pressured into making the retraction, and therefore
it's not a genuine admittance that his original statement was incorrect.
SOURCE: I learnt of this original from Waters Flowing Eastwards by L. Fry
Posted by The Black Rabbit of Inlé at 11:25
Wednesday, 23 May 2012
Henry Ludwig Mond, 2nd Baron Melchett (1898 – 1949)
The following is taken from the editorial in The Jewish Western Bulletin (Vancouver),
January 11th, 1934. The paper's editor was then was a S. A. Goldston, a Zionist.
"The formal re-union of Lord Melchett with Judaism has attracted wide-spread attention in the Press. ... But probably the wisest among us all will look askance at the inordinate publicity with which the occurance was invested, and which does not seem to have been officially discouraged. It gave an appearance of public exultation which is not flattering to Jewish self-respect and could have hardly been pleasing to his Lordship himself. Apparently we have a lot to learn in the art of managing such events. ...
Lord Melchett is a symbol of the remarkable things that are going on in Germany today. There we are told, under the shock of Nazi Storm Troopers, many former non-Zionists are suddenly seeing the beacon light of Palestine. In particular—and this is most significant—are young German Jews turning Zion-wards. Not only that, but the "religionslos" Jews are dropping the "los" and rejoining the old Faith. Children of mixed marriages no longer treat Judaims as the unregarded step-mother Faith, the "misfortune" rather than the religion Heine declared it to be. There is a great demand about books of Jewish history and other branches of Jewish knowledge. In a word, German Jews—not, of course, all of them—have rediscovered their Jewish bearings and, let us hope, repent of the foolish back-sliding of prosperous days. And so, just as Hitler, by his comic genealogical researches, has only succeeded in adding hundreds of thousand more "Jews" to the resurgent "third Reich", so his oppresive measures have only succeeded in making many other Jews more Jewish.
... let us not forget the re-awakening of German Jewry may have, probably has had, its echoes elsewhere. It is not only the German Jew who has been brought by Hitlerism sharp up against realities, and has found a new interest in the Jewish faith and the Jewish lot.